Live data

Tracking quality across the open web

Aggregate stats from every public TagEasy audit. We never store the actual site contents — these numbers are just the per-check tally, vendor detections, and platform guess. Refresh hourly.

Sites audited

106

Median score

49 / 100

Mean score

48 / 100

Consent Mode v2

pass rate

What this means

# Tracking Quality Benchmark: All Platforms The median audit score of 49 reveals a field in crisis. Every single site failed page-load performance checks, and 92 percent lack proper Consent Mode v2 implementation—with only 8 percent passing consent audits overall. GA4 measurement ID failures hit 76 percent, suggesting widespread analytics misconfiguration. The vendor landscape shows heavy reliance on analytics (GTM 21%, GA4 20%) and ad pixels (Google Ads 12%, Meta 9%) with minimal session-replay adoption (Hotjar at just 15% of audits). CDPs are virtually absent at 1–2 percent penetration. This imbalance—robust ad-tracking infrastructure paired with weak consent controls and broken page-load behavior—indicates sites are collecting data aggressively while failing basic performance and privacy standards. Run a full audit now to identify page-load blockers and audit your consent implementation against v2 standards.

Generated from the headline stats above. Refreshes hourly.

Score distribution

Where the typical site lands on the 0–100 tracking-quality scale.

0–19 (broken)

20 sites

20–39 (poor)

1 site

40–59 (mixed)

61 sites

60–79 (decent)

10 sites

80–100 (healthy)

14 sites

Where most sites fail

Pass / warn / fail rate per check, sorted by what trips up the most sites.

Check	Pass	Warn	Fail
Page load	0%	0%	100%
Consent Mode v2	8%	0%	92%
GA4 measurement ID	24%	0%	76%
GTM container	26%	74%	0%
Meta Pixel	12%	88%	0%
TikTok Pixel	6%	94%	0%
Google Ads conversion	15%	85%	0%
Consent banner	29%	71%	0%
DataLayer initialised	32%	68%	0%
PII in URL	100%	0%	0%
Tracking script weight	100%	0%	0%
GTM debug mode	100%	0%	0%
HTTPS	100%	0%	0%
Single GA4 property	93%	7%	0%